Skip to main content
ExactSum ExactSum from Titan
ExactSum ExactSum

CLIENT LENDING · APPLICATION PACKAGING

See the file the way the lender will

When you support a client's borrowing, the lender is going to read their statements with a credit engine. ExactSum runs the same analysis first, so you find the questions before the underwriter does.

Before the file goes out

  • 01 Affordability calculated from what actually landed
  • 02 Existing commitments found and sized, including the forgotten ones
  • 03 The entries an underwriter will query, listed in advance
  • 04 A summary the lender can read without re-keying anything

99.4%

extraction accuracy, measured against manual review

50 in 5

client files read in five minutes, not five days

12 months

of history read on every account

01 / The file

Why applications come back

Rarely because the client cannot afford it. Usually because something in the statements was never explained, and the file went out anyway.

A colleague talking a junior through a file

01

A commitment the client forgot to mention

02

Director drawings that look like trading income

03

A run of returned direct debits eighteen months ago

04

Revenue that arrives through three processors under three names

05

A two-week round trip for a question you could have answered

02 / What comes back

What comes back before you submit

The same modules a lender runs, run on your client's file first, with every finding tied to the line that produced it.

What will the lender see as income?

Revenue Streams Balance Analysis Recurring Transactions Cash Deposits

What will they query?

Unpaid / Returned Overdraft Analysis Loan Analysis Direct Debit Analysis

What proves who they are?

Director Transfers HMRC Transactions Lender Flag
See the full feature list →

03 / Your checks

Your submission standard, checked before it leaves

Set what a file needs before your practice puts its name to it. Every client application comes back sorted, so nothing goes out with a hole in it.

Ready to send

Nothing outstanding — the file can go to the lender.

Exported as a summary the lender can read directly.

Needs a note

Something an underwriter will ask about.

Answer it in the covering note, not in three weeks.

Hold

A problem worth fixing before you submit at all.

Flagged with the evidence, while there is time to act.

Every outcome links back to the transactions that produced it.

04 / What changes

What changes for the practice

Fewer files come back

The questions an underwriter would have raised are answered in the covering note, so the application moves instead of bouncing.

You advise before you apply

Seeing what a lender will see means you can tell a client to wait three months, or to approach someone else, before a decline lands on their record.

The work is billable in an afternoon

Reading a year of statements by hand is a day nobody wants to charge for. Reading it in minutes turns application support into a service you can offer routinely.

05 / Coverage

Works when Open Banking doesn't

No consent, no integration. If the applicant can produce a statement, ExactSum can read it.

Any document

The bank's PDF, a scan, or a phone photo — all read the same way.

Twelve months, not ninety days

A full year of history where Open Banking shows a quarter.

Accounts APIs can't reach

Foreign accounts, business accounts, legacy banks, and applicants who decline to connect.

Also

Also for accountancy firms

Try it on an application you have already sent

Send us the statements from a client file you have submitted. We will show you what ExactSum returns and what the lender was likely to ask.